Current Issue
Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): March 2026
About Journal
Journal of Applied Materials and Technology (JAMT) is aimed at capturing current development and initiatives in applied materials and technology. JAMT showcases innovative applied materials and technology, providing an opportunity for science, transfer and collaboration of technology.
JAMT focuses on the publication in the area of material science, material engineering and technology, renewable energy, sustainable material and construction method. The selected, high-quality reviews, research reports at the state of the art of the science and material technology are welcomed.
At Journal of Applied Materials and Technology (JAMT), we uphold a commitment to scholarly integrity and transparent publishing practices. In light of the growing role of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative language models (LLMs), the authors should follow our guidence regarding this matter from this link.
The journal will publish at least two issues (Bi-Annually. First issue in March and Second in September) each year. Articles are published online when ready for publication (Continuously) as Article in Press. Additional issues may be published for special events (e.g. conferences) and when special themes are addressed. If you want to submit an article, please follow this link.
As a member of Crossref, JAMT participates in Crossmark, a multi-publisher initiative, to provide a standard way for readers to locate the authoritative version of a document. The appearance of the Crossmark logo on a document indicates that JAMT is committed to maintaining the content it publishes and to alerting readers to changes if and when they occur. Clicking the Crossmark logo on a document will tell you its current status and may also give you additional publication-record information about the document. If an update exists, the status information will include a Crossref DOI link to the updated document and any associated documents such as Errata, Expressions of Concern, and Retractions.
Articles
Preparation and characterization of MoS2 thin films for thermoelectric applications using the PVD technique
Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) is a two-dimensional material with electronic and thermal properties that make it promising for thermoelectric applications. This research presents the results of synthesizing and characterizing MoS2 thin films obtained by Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) on silicon dioxide (SiO2) substrates. Three experimental approaches were explored to assess how changes in deposition conditions affect the material quality. In the first trial, films were formed from commercial MoS? powder in a sulfur-rich (S2) atmosphere using a PVD tubular furnace. Next, water vapor (H2O) was added to the process to observe possible improvements in material formation. Finally, silver doping was investigated, introduced during deposition to examine structural and vibrational changes in the MoS2. The samples were characterized by Optical Microscopy (OM) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), as well as Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS), used to evaluate surface morphology and composition. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) was employed to identify the crystalline structure, while Raman Spectroscopy revealed the E2g1 and A1g vibrational modes, associated with the crystallinity of the material. The results indicated that the presence of H2O during deposition favored the growth of more ordered films, with more intense peaks in XRD and Raman spectra. On the other hand, silver doping caused vibrational changes that suggest modifications in the electronic structure of MoS2. These findings reinforce the material’s potential for use in thermoelectric devices and demonstrate that variations in synthesis conditions can significantly enhance its structural and functional properties.
Finite Element-Based Validation of Infill Wall Material Model for Seismic Response Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frames
Masonry infill walls are commonly used in reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings for both architectural and environmental reasons. Although many consider RC systems to be non-structural, their interaction with surrounding frames can have a significant impact on their lateral stiffness, strength, and seismic performance. This can lead to stiffness issues and soft-story failures during earthquakes. This study looks at the structural function of masonry infills. It compares the experimental load-displacement backbone curve of an infilled RC frame with numerical predictions from four well-known Equivalent Diagonal Strut (EDS) models: Holmes, Mainstone, Liau and Kwan, and Paulay and Priestley. We looked at how well the models performed for both serviceability (initial stiffness) and ultimate limit states (peak lateral strength). The findings demonstrate a definite trade-off in predictive accuracy. With a mean stiffness ratio of 1.38, the Mainstone model yielded the most accurate estimate of elastic stiffness. The Holmes and Liau and Kwan models, on the other hand, significantly overestimated stiffness (ratio = 1.92). All models were conservative (ratios < 1.0) for peak strength. Holmes and Liau and Kwan produced the closest predictions (ratio = 0.84), while Mainstone was the most conservative (ratio = 0.80). These results indicate that the best choice of EDS model depends on the design goal: Mainstone is better for serviceability assessments, while Holmes and Liau and Kwan provide more realistic predictions for ultimate lateral capacity.